sobota 30. dubna 2016

Student Evaluation Czech Cinema CIEE Fall 2015

Student Evaluation Czech Cinema CIEE Fall 2015

FAMU International: Flm Style and Form



Film Style and Form

FAMU International, CDM
Spring 2016
Instructor: Petra Dominková, PhD.
Class Time: Thursday 6:10 – 7.40 (FAMU, U3, Lažanský Palais, Smetanovo nábřeží 2)
Contact: petra.dominkova@gmail.com
Office hours: by appointment

Course Description:
The spring term will focus 1/ on sound, often neglected aspect of film style, and 2/ on narration. The students will watch on their own films in their entirety and in class short extracts illustrating particular topics. Discussion is important part of each lesson. Mutual exchange of ideas and artistic experiences enables the students to gain as much inspiration as possible. Students should ask anything that is not clear enough, bring their own ideas and participate actively in the whole course. (The course partially covers the topics for CDM final exam.)

Requirements:
Mid-term essay: 1 000 words
Due date: 24 March 2015
               AND
Final essay: 1 000 words
Due date: 12 May 2015

Students themselves will choose the topic for the paper. Papers have to be typed and may be sent via email. Due date is not negotiable. If a student must request an extension, she/he has to do it before the paper is due. All sources (films, books, articles, interviews, websites etc) have to be cited: any time student quotes or paraphrases someone else’s work she/he has to give her/him credit, otherwise it is understood as plagiarism, that is unaceptable and will cause student‘s failing from the assignmnet and may lead to failing from the overall course as well.

Presentation
A presentation based on the film and reading. The student will lead the discussion about the film we watched. This involves preparing a handout or PWP and creating discussion questions for the group. (Send me the handout at least 24 hours before the class begins!) The goal is to get us talking about the certain traits of film style and how it demonstrates itself in the particular film. The discussion should last 30 - 45 minutes.



Grading will be based on three aspects:
Participation in discussion: 33.3%
plus TWO from the following assignments (based on each student’s choice):
Midterm Essay: 33.3%
Final Essay: 33.3%
Presentation: 33.3%
Grading Table

Grade
percent
1000 points
333 points
A
100-96              
1000-960              
333-320
A –
95-90
959-900
321-300
B+
89-87
899-870
299-290
B
86-83
869-830
289-276
B –
82-80
829-800
275-267
C+
79-76
799-760
266-253
C
75-70
759-700
252-233
D
69-60
699-600
232-200
F
59-0
599-0
199-0

1.        (February 11)
Sound: Introduction

2.                 (February 18)
The Functions of Dialogue in Narrative Film
Reading: Bordwell, Thompson, 269-298 + Kozloff (2000), 33-63.
Discussion: Money  (L’Argent, Robert Bresson, France, 1983, 85)

3.                 (February 25)
Dialogue in Melodrama
Reading: Kozloff (2000), 235-266.
Discussion: The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (Les parapluis de Cherbourg, J. Demmy, France, 1964, 91’)

4.                 (March 3)
Dance Music
Reading: Hexel.
Discussion: Run, Lola, Run  (Lola rennt, Tom Tykwer, Germany, 1998, 81’)

5.                 (March 10)
Class canceled (make-up will take place May-12 9.15-10.45 pm at Café Nona)
6.                 (March 17) 
Musique concrète
Reading: Koizumi.
Discussion: Pitfall  (Otoshiana, Hiroshi Teshigahara, Japan, 1962, 97’)

7.                 (March 24)
Noise and silence
Reading: Nardelli
Discussion: The Night (La Notte, Michelangelo Antonioni, Italy, 1961)

8.                 (March 31)
Point of Audition
Reading: Coyle
Discussion: Cloverfield (Matt Reeves, USA, 2008, 85’)

9.       (April 7)
Narration: Introduction
Reading: Bordwell, Thompson, 78-101.
Discussion: Witness (A tanú, Péter Bacsó, Hungary, 1969, 105’)

10.     (April 14)
Point of View
Reading: Branigan
Discussion: Being John Malkovich (Spike Jonze, USA, 1999, 112’)

11.     (April 21)
Spectator in the Text
Reading: Browne
Discussion: Stagecoach (John Ford, USA, 1939, 96’)

12.     (April 28)
Network Narratives
Reading: Bordwell (2008)
Discussion: Babel (Alejandro Gonzáles Iñárritu, France/USA/Mexico, 2006, 143’)

13.     (May 5)
Voice-over narration: First-person narrator
Reading: Kozloff (1989), 41-71 + Brickman.
Discussion: Badlands  (Terrence Malick, USA, 1973, 94’)

14.     (May 12)
Voice-over narration: Third-person narrator
Reading: Kozloff (1989), 72-102.
Discussion: The Naked City (Jules Dassin, USA, 1948, 96’)

PLUS

Feedback (May 12; 8.30-10 pm; Café Nona)

Readings:
Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. Film Art. An Introduction. McGraw-Hill, 2010. 78-101, 269-298.
Bordwell, David. ”Mutual Friends and Chronologies of Chance.” Poetics of Cinema. New York and London: Routledge, 2008. 189-250.
Branigan, Edward. “The Point of View Shot.” Movies and Methods, vol. II. Ed. by Bill Nichols. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1985. 672-691.
Browne, Nick. “The Spectator-in-the-Text: The Rhetoric of Stagecoach.” Film Quarterly 29.2 (Winter 1975-76): 26-38.  (see http://faculty.washington.edu/cbehler/glossary/browneSpec.html)
Coyle, Rebecca. “Point of Audition. Sound and Music in Cloverfield.” Science Fiction Film and Television 3:2 (2010), 217-238.
Hexel, Vasco. “The use of dance music and the synergy of narrative vehicles in Run Lola Run.” The Soundtrack 3.2, 83-96.
Koizumi, Kyoko. “Creative Soundtrack Expression. Tôru Takemitsu’s Score for Kwaidan.” Genre, Music, and Sound: Terror Tracks: Music, Sound, and Horror Cinema. Ed. by Philip Hayward. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd., 2009. 88-100.

Kozloff, Sarah. Invisible Storytellers: Voice-Over Narration in American Fiction Film. University of California Press, 1989. 41-102.

Kozloff, Sarah. Overhearing Film Dialogue. Ewing, NJ: University of California Press, 2000. 33-63, 235-266.
Nardelli, Matilde. “Some reflections on Antonioni, sound, and the silence of La Notte.” The Soundtrack 3:1 (2010), 11-23.

NYU/FAMU: Topics from (Czech and) European Film History



New York University
Tisch School of the Arts
Course Sylabus
TOPICS FROM (CZECH AND) EUROPEAN FILM HISTORY
Spring 2016
Monday 9:00-11:25 a.m. + Wednesday 10:40 a.m. -12.15 p.m.
Instructor Name: Petra Dominkova, PhD.

Course Objectives:
The aim of the course is to make students familiar with some of the innovative moments in the history of Czech (and East European) cinema. The subject will be presented within the historical, political, and cultural contexts. The historical facts and artistic/theoretical ideas will be accompanied by specific examples. During the sessions students will watch films in their entirety (with English subtitles) or short extracts illustrating particular topic.

Requirements:
Final Test: five questions about topics and films which were discussed in class.
Participation in discussions: Student are expected to vividly participate in dicsussions.
Presentation: A presentation based on a film seen within the class and the required reading. Sudent will prepare PWP and/or handout. Presentation should last at least 45 minutes and should include at least 5 discussion questions. Send me your presentation ahead – until Sunday
evening – to I can provide you with the feedback.

Evaluation:
Final test: 35%
Participation in discussion: 32,5%
Presentation: 32,5%

Class meetings:
Monday: Klimentská;
Wednesday FAMU main building classroom no. 7

Contact:
office hours: by appointment
tel: +420 739 053 950

Week 1 MON, February 1
Theme:
Introduction + Chronology; Mise-en-scene

Week 1 WED, February 3
Screening: Ida, dir. Pawel Pawlikowski (Poland, 2013, 82)
Week 2 MON, February 8
Discussion: Ida (discuss particularly Mise-en-scene)
Reading: Elsaesser, Thomas and Warren Buckland. Studying Contemporary American Film: A Guide To Movie Analysis. London: Arnold and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 80-106. Print. (Chapter Mise-en-scène Criticism and Statistical Style Analysis (The English patient).)
Theme: WW2 and Holocaust in East European cinema: various approaches
Closely Watched Trains, dir. Jiří Menzel (1967); Shop on the Main Street, dir. Elmar Klos + Ján Kadár (1965); Protector, dir. Marek Najbrt (2009), etc.

Week 2 WED, February 10
Screening: Daisies , dir. Věra Chytilová (Sedmikrásky, Czech Republic, 1966, 74’)
Editing

Week 3 MON, February 15
Discussion: Daisies (discuss particularly Editing)
Reading: Lim, Bliss Cua. “Dolls in Fragments: Daisies as Feminist Allegory.” Camera Obscura 16.2: 3677. Print.
Theme: Female filmmakers in Eastern Europe. Věra Chytilová, Ildiko Enyedi, Agnieszka Holland
Various films by the directors mentioned above.

Week 3 WED, February 17
Screening: Firemen’s Ball, dir. Miloš Forman (Hoří, má panenko, Czech republic, 1969, 71’)
Framing

Week 4 MON, February 22
Discussion: Firemen’s Ball (discuss particularly Framing)
Reading: Branigan, Edward. Approaches to Semiotics (AS): Point of View in the Cinema. Tubingen, DEU: Walter de Gruyter, 2012. 39–72. Print.
Theme: Czechoslovak New Wave I: Inspirations. French Nouvelle Vague, Italian neorealism, etc.
Les quatre cents coups, dir. François Truffaut (1959); Cléo de 5 à 7, dir. Agnès Varda (1962); Ladri di biciclette, dir. Vittorio De Sica (1948)

Week 4 WED, February 24
Screening: Happiness, dir. Agnés Varda (Le Bonheur, France, 1965, 79) + Color

Week 5 MON, February 29
Discussion: Happiness (discuss particularly Color)
Reading: DeRoo,Rebecca J. “Unhappily ever after: visual irony and feminist strategy in Agnès Varda’s Le Bonheur.” Studies in French Cinema 8:3 (September 2008): 189–209. Print.
Theme: Czechoslovak New Wave II: Poetics and Politics
Cremator, dir. Juraj Herz (1968); Joke, dir. Jaromil Jireš (1969)

Week 5 WED, March 2
Theme: The 1970s and 1980s

Week 6 MON, March 28
Theme: Experimental Films / Jan Švankmajer + Sound
Czech experimental films + short films by J. Švankmajer

Week 6 WED, March 30
Screening: Conspirators of Pleasure; dir. Jan Švankmajer (Spiklenci slasti, Czech Republic, 1996, 85’)

Week 7 MON, April 4
Discussion: Conspirators of Pleasure (discuss particularly Sound)
Reading: Jackson, Wendy. “The Surrealist Conspirator: An Interview with jan Svankmajer.” Animation World Magazzine 2:3 (June 1997): n. pag. Web. 15 August 2014 <http://www.awn.com/mag/issue2.3/issue2.3pages/2.3jacksonsvankmajer.html>.
Shaviro, Steven. “Conspirators of Pleasure.” The Pinocchio Theory 11 Feb 2007: n. pag. Web. 20 July 2014 <http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p=555>.
Theme: Preparation for final test.
Screening: Taxidermia; dir. György Pálfi (Hungary, 2006, 91’)

Week 7 WED, April 6
Discussion: Taxidermia; dir. György Pálfi (Hungary, 2006, 91’)
Reading: Shaviro, Steven. “Body Horror and Post-Socialist cinema: György Pálfi’s Taxidermia.” A Companion to Eastern European Cinemas. Ed. Aniko Imré. Chichester, U.K. ; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 2012. 25–40. Print. (Also at Web. 20 July 2014 <http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Taxidermia.pdf>)

Week 8 MON, May 2
Final Test

Week 8 WED, May 4
Discussion about the class

Readings:
Branigan, Edward. Approaches to Semiotics (AS): Point of View in the Cinema. Tubingen, DEU: Walter de Gruyter, 2012. 39–72. Print.
DeRoo,Rebecca J. “Unhappily ever after: visual irony and feminist strategy in Agnès Varda’s Le Bonheur.” Studies in French Cinema 8:3 (September 2008): 189–209. Print.
Elsaesser, Thomas and Warren Buckland. Studying Contemporary American Film: A Guide To Movie Analysis. London: Arnold and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. 80-106. Print. (Chapter Mise-en-scène Criticism and Statistical Style Analysis (The English patient).)
Jackson, Wendy. “The Surrealist Conspirator: An Interview with jan Svankmajer.” Animation World Magazzine 2:3 (June 1997): n. pag. Web. 15 August 2014 <http://www.awn.com/mag/issue2.3/issue2.3pages/2.3jacksonsvankmajer.html>.
Lim, Bliss Cua. “Dolls in Fragments: Daisies as Feminist Allegory.” Camera Obscura 16.2: 3677. Print.
Shaviro, Steven. “Body Horror and Post-Socialist cinema: György Pálfi’s Taxidermia.” A Companion to Eastern European Cinemas. Ed. Aniko Imré. Chichester, U.K. ; Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 2012. 25–40. Print. (Also at Web. 20 July 2014 <http://www.shaviro.com/Othertexts/Taxidermia.pdf>)
Shaviro, Steven. “Conspirators of Pleasure.” The Pinocchio Theory 11 Feb 2007: n. pag. Web. 20 July 2014 <http://www.shaviro.com/Blog/?p=555>.